Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2016 Oct 24;60:179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2016.10.010

Table 3.

Alignment efficiencies and conversion rates for ERRBS of all samples.

Sample Total Reads Trimmed Reads Unique Alignment Alignment Efficiency Conversion Rate
Control 1 101,048,410 100,855,039 62,220,409 61.70% 99.40%
Control 2 127,821,721 127,215,674 78,361,090 61.60% 99.00%
Control 3 102,862,686 102,170,841 58,944,438 57.70% 99.10%
Maternal Ethanol 1 109,878,778 108,966,846 52,870,280 48.50% 98.90%
Maternal Ethanol 2 124,275,848 123,559,339 74,581,912 60.40% 99.20%
Maternal Ethanol 3 107,454,830 106,658,607 64,249,678 60.20% 99.30%
Paternal Ethanol 1 114,893,371 113,982,695 69,455,351 60.90% 99.30%
Paternal Ethanol 2 106,580,485 105,705,397 69,203,843 65.50% 99.20%
Paternal Ethanol 3 99,166,858 98,773,966 61,786,238 62.60% 99.20%
Maternal + Paternal 1 139,906,554 138,640,440 81,779,772 59.00% 99.10%
Maternal + Paternal 2 121,250,474 120,463,927 69,505,491 57.70% 99.10%
Maternal + Paternal 3 106,204,238 105,806,869 66,903,713 63.20% 99.40%