Table 2.
Base rate | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Efficiency | Kappa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | High P-SDQ score | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.52 |
7 | High Y-SDQ score | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.20 |
8 | High P-SDQ symptom + impact | 0.24 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.65 |
9 | High Y-SDQ symptom + impact | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.24 |
10 | High PY-SDQ symptom + impact | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.65 |
11 | High P-DAWBA band | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.43 |
12 | High Y-DAWBA band | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.97 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.33 |
13 | High PY-DAWBA band | 0.18 | 0.50 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.48 |
SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, DAWBA Development and Well-Being Assessment, all kappas significant at p < 0.001; PPV positive predicted value, NPV negative predicted value