Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 30;48(3):385–392. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0

Table 2.

Predicting from dichotomous measures to sample status in the combined community and clinic sample (N = 338)

Base rate Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Efficiency Kappa
6 High P-SDQ score 0.17 0.51 0.95 0.77 0.85 0.84 0.52
7 High Y-SDQ score 0.05 0.16 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.20
8 High P-SDQ symptom + impact 0.24 0.71 0.92 0.76 0.90 0.87 0.65
9 High Y-SDQ symptom + impact 0.06 0.20 0.98 0.81 0.78 0.78 0.24
10 High PY-SDQ symptom + impact 0.23 0.70 0.93 0.78 0.90 0.87 0.65
11 High P-DAWBA band 0.14 0.42 0.95 0.73 0.83 0.81 0.43
12 High Y-DAWBA band 0.09 0.29 0.97 0.78 0.80 0.80 0.33
13 High PY-DAWBA band 0.18 0.50 0.93 0.72 0.85 0.82 0.48

SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, DAWBA Development and Well-Being Assessment, all kappas significant at p < 0.001; PPV positive predicted value, NPV negative predicted value