Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 30;48(3):385–392. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0

Table 3.

Predicting from dichotomous measures to expert diagnostic rating in the combined community and clinic sample (N  = 338)

Base rate Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Efficiency Kappa
14 High P-SDQ score 0.17 0.51 0.94 0.74 0.85 0.83 0.50
15 High Y-SDQ score 0.05 0.18 0.99 0.83 0.79 0.79 0.23
16 High P-SDQ symptom + impact 0.24 0.69 0.91 0.71 0.90 0.86 0.60
17 High Y-SDQ symptom + impact 0.06 0.20 0.98 0.81 0.79 0.79 0.25
18 High PY-SDQ symptom + impact 0.23 0.72 0.93 0.78 0.91 0.88 0.67
19 High P-DAWBA band 0.14 0.52 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.57
20 High Y-DAWBA band 0.09 0.36 0.99 0.94 0.83 0.84 0.45
21 High PY-DAWBA band 0.18 0.64 0.97 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.67

SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, DAWBA Development and Well-Being Assessment, all kappas significant at p < 0.001; PPV positive predicted value, NPV negative predicted value