Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;61(1):1304692. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1304692

Table 1.

Characteristics differences between acceptable reporters (= 1955) and unacceptable reporters (= 2955) who were breakfast consumers.

Characteristics Acceptable reporters
Unacceptable reporters
χ2 p-value
n (%) n (%)
Area     0.72 0.732
Urban 1330 (40.0) 1996 (60.0)    
Rural 625 (39.5) 959 (60.5)    
Sex     18.46 0.000
Boys 809 (36.5) 1407 (63.5)    
Girls 1146 (42.5) 1548 (57.5)    
Age groups     15.29 0.000
6 – 9 years 1171 (42.2) 1603 (57.8)    
10 – 12 years 784 (36.7) 1352 (63.3)    
Ethnic groups     30.17 0.000
Malay 1334 (41.9) 1847 (58.1)    
Chinese 263 (32.1) 557 (67.9)    
Indian 130 (35.6) 235 (64.4)    
Bumiputera Sabah/Sarawak 228 (41.9) 316 (58.1)    
Income group (MYR)     4.00 0.136
Low (<1500) 629 (40.9) 908 (59.1)    
Middle (1501–7500) 1058 (38.7) 1676 (61.3)    
High (>7500) 217 (42.7) 291 (57.3)    
Father’s education level     1.87 0.172
Secondary and below 1155 (39.1) 1797 (60.9)    
Tertiary 701 (41.2) 1002 (58.8)    
Mother’s education level     0.53 0.477
Secondary and below 1196 (39.4) 1836 (60.6)    
Tertiary 691 (40.5) 1014 (59.5)    
RTEC consumption     4.08 0.045
RTEC consumers 347 (43.0) 460 (57.0)    
Non-RTEC consumers 1608 (39.2) 2496 (60.8)