Abstract
Background:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in worldwide. This nested case–control study investigated the predictors of death in long-term follow-up after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
Methods:
Cases were defined as CABG patients who died in the period of May 2006–March 2013. Controls were CABG patients who were alive in the same period. Cases and controls were derived from an existing cohort, Tehran Heart Center-Coronary Outcome Measurement. One hundred and fifty-nine patients in control group were randomly selected from 566 available patients in follow-up database. A series of simple and multiple logistic regressions was performed in the context of univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively, for computing unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and their confidence intervals (CI). In the univariate analyses, demographic or cardiometabolic factors were entered separately, and for multivariate analysis, we got both significant risk factors from univariate analysis and the major risk factors.
Results:
The results of multivariate analyses showed that for age, the likelihood of mortality increases in CABG patients (95%CI: 1.1; 1.03–1.2; P < 0.005). Other significant independent risk factors were peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (95%CI: 2.7; 1.06–6.8; P = 0.036), diabetics (95%CI: 2.49; 0.9–6.3; P = 0.039), smoking (95%CI: 4.38; 1.45–13.7; P = 0.011), length of stay in hospital after CABG surgery (95%CI: 1.14; 1.0–1.24; P = 0.001), total cholesterol (95%CI: 1.12; 1–1.2; P = 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (95%CI: 1.12; 0.99–1.27; P = 0.049) (all P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The study results indicated that age, diabetes, cigarette smoking, PVD, long length of stay in hospital, elevated triglycerides, total cholesterol, CRP, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significant contributing to increased mortality after CABG. It seems that vulnerable older patients continue to be at high risk with poor outcomes.
Keywords: Cardiometabolic risk factors, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, mortality, outcome
Introduction
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading causes of mortality and morbidity as well as the major causes of disability worldwide. CAD is responsible for more than half of all the deaths annually.[1] CAD and its risk factors have become a major health problem globally. For nearly 50 years, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has remained the predominant mode of revascularization and complete treatment for ischemic heart diseases.[2] The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have outlined that the major risk factors for CAD are cigarette smoking, hypertension, elevated serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), diabetes mellitus, and advancing age. Other factors are associated with increased risk for CAD such as obesity, family history of CAD, inflammatory markers, elevated serum triglycerides (TGs), and ethnic characteristics.[3] A substantial number of studies have identified that these risk factors are associated with death among CABG patients. These risk factors are diabetes mellitus,[4] obesity,[5] age,[6] gender, family history of coronary heart disease (CHD), cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.[5] Jones et al. demonstrated that elevated early postoperative glucose levels dramatically increase mortality rate after CABG.[6] The review study of cardiopulmonary outcomes by Thiessen et al. indicated that appropriate glycemic control during and after cardiac surgery prevents additional damage to CABG patients.[7] Similar study has demonstrated that patients with failure in diabetes management are more likely to experience increased risk of congestive heart failure, increased mortality rate.[8]
According to AHA and ACC statements, some characteristics of patient's lifestyle increased the risk for CAD.[3] Addiction and illicit drug abuse is contributed to potentially problematic and specific risky lifestyle among CABG patients[9] and is considered as a serious public health and social problem in Iran.[10] Furthermore, available evidence from Iran shows that the prevalence of addiction among cardiac surgery patients approaches to higher than 20% in men.[11]
The nested case–control study is a relatively new observational approach that increasingly being used to identify novel cardiac risk factors.[12] This design has the advantage of allowing for statistically efficient analysis of data from a cohort with substantial savings cost and time.[13] Case–control (cross-sectional) studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes of CABG patients.[14] However, an unselected study of risk factors for death among CABG patients in long term has not been previously performed in Iran. The aim of this nested case–control study on patients undergoing CABG surgery was investigated to determine potential risk factors associated with mortality risk.
Methods
Study design
This is a nested case–control study in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing CABG. Cases and controls were derived from an existing cohort, Tehran Heart Center (THC)-Coronary Outcome Measurement started in patients undergoing CABG in a tertiary level cardiac hospital, Tehran, Iran. Baseline data were collected as part of the large study started in May 2006, and 566 admitted patients to surgical ward were invited to participate in the study by their informed consent. All patients who underwent CABG were followed up until discharge and then in different time intervals until March 2013. In addition, hospital records were reviewed by a trained research assistant and initially enrolled patient's phone numbers extracted. Phone call interviews were conducted with patients or family members if died during the follow-up. Follow-up data were available for 566 patients. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the study. The institutional review board of THC approved the study.
Figure 1.

The study flowchart
Definition of cases and controls
Cases were defined as CABG patients who were died in the period between May 2006 and March 2013. Controls were CABG patients that were alive in the same period. The all 53 patients of the cohort, who died, selected as cases; for each case, two controls were randomly selected from the cohort data.[15] The randomly selection of controls was performed through STATA resampling command.[16]
Data collection
Data collection was conducted through interviews, physical and clinical examinations. Demographics (gender, age, family history of CAD, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, opium addiction, history of myocardial infarction (MI), and having diabetes and hypertension), fasting blood sugar, total cholesterol, HDL-C, TGs, LDL-C, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, hematocrit, lipoprotein (LP), C-reactive protein (CRP), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), ejection fraction (EF), and body mass index (BMI) were measured.
Measuring the baseline characteristics as preoperative risk factors including: current smoking history (patient regularly smokes a tobacco product/products one or more times per day or has smoked in 30 days before admission),[17] alcohol consumption (the use of alcohol in average 1/week despite recurrent adverse consequences),[18] opium dependence (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition criteria for substance dependence, daily regular using of substances),[19] family history of CAD (first-degree relatives before the age of 55 in men and 65 years in women),[20] hypertension (blood pressure reading ≥140/90 mmHg, current use of antihypertensive medications),[21] diabetes mellitus (symptoms of diabetes plus at least one of the following: plasma glucose concentration = 200 mg/dl [11.1 mmol/L], fasting plasma glucose = 126 mg/dl [7.0 mmol/L], plasma glucose 2 h postprandial = 200 mg/dl [11.1 mmol/L]),[22] cerebrovascular disease, and PVD. Furthermore, EuroSCORE, number of grafts, and length of stay in hospital after CABG were extracted from the baseline database.
Based on AHA/ACC statement,[3] the cardiovascular risk factors were classified into the major risk factors including cigarette smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, HDL, diabetes mellitus, and age and the other risk factors including drug addiction, alcohol use, BMI, LP, TG, family history of CAD, CRP, number of grafts, length of stay in hospital after CABG, and EuroSCORE. Because of the great association between opium addiction and cigarette smoking, we categorized into three subgroups as cigarette smoking, opium abuse, and concurrent cigarette smoking and opium abuse. Major risk factors and other risk factors were analyzed by two univariate and multiple logistic regression models separately.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using the STATA release 12.0 software (College Station, Texas, USA). Data were presented using frequency (percent) for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation [SD]) for numeric variables. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline characteristics to compare case and controls for each outcome. Between-group differences were measured using χ2 or Student's t-tests, as appropriate. A series of simple and multiple logistic regressions was performed in the context of univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively, for computing unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their confidence intervals (CIs). Mortality status considered as the dependent outcome of interest by coding one for dead and coding zero for live patients. In the univariate analyses, demographic or cardiometabolic factors were entered separately, and for multivariate analysis, we got both significant risk factors from univariate analysis and the major risk factors. P < 0.05 considered to be as significant.
Results
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics in cases and controls. In this prospective study of 566 CABG patients, 53 cases and 106 randomly selected controls were evaluated. Of these, 77.3% were men and 22.6% were women. The mean ages at baseline were 64.1 years (SD = 8.6) and 58.4 years (SD = 8.3) in cases and controls, respectively. The cases were approximately 6 years older than the controls. The mean values of BMI were 26.3 kg/m2 (SD = 4.2) and 27 kg/m2 (SD = 4.1) in cases and controls, respectively. There were significant differences between cases and controls for hypertension (47.2 vs. 39.5) (P < 0.05). Compared with controls, the cases had significantly higher rate of opium use (25.5% vs. 11.7%). In addition, there were significant differences between the cases and controls regarding the mean values of BUN (cases: 44.5 ± 16.1, controls 38.8 ± 11.1), PVD (41.5% vs. 23.8), and CRP (cases: 8.4 ± 6.2, controls: 5.9 ± 2.2) (P < 0.05 for all).
Table 1.
Demographic and cardiometabolic factors in two groups of the case and nested-control

The results of the univariate and multivariate analyses based on logistic regression for unadjusted and adjusted ORs for participant characteristics to predict mortality are shown in Table 2. Age, gender, history of MI, diabetes, BMI, EF, smoking and opium addiction, alcohol use, number of grafts, length of stay in hospital after CABG, EuroSCORE, PVD, total cholesterol, CRP, BUN, LDL, TG, and HDL were included into simple logistic regression (unadjusted ORs). The results showed that for age, the likelihood of mortality increases in CABG patients (95%CI: 1.08; 1.03–1.2; P = 0.001). Other significant independent risk factors were length of stay in hospital after CABG surgery (95%CI: 1.14; 1.0–1.29; P = 0.04), PVD (95%CI: 2.8.01; 1.38–5.9; P = 0.004), total cholesterol (95%CI: 1.01; 1–1.2; P = 0.012), LDL-C (95%CI: 1.13; 1.0–1.23; P = 0.007), and CRP (95%CI: 1.2; 1.04–1.39; P = 0.009). Although participants with opium addiction and cigarette smoking had 60% and 2.57 times the odds of mortality than others, it did not achieve statistical significance.
Table 2.
Results of logistic regression for unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for participant characteristics

The significant and the major risk factors including age, diabetes, cigarette smoking, hypertension, Length of stay in hospital after CABG, PVD, total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, BUN, CRP, and TG were candidate as to enter in the multivariate analysis. Age, having diabetes, smoking, length of stay in hospital after CABG, PVD, TG, total cholesterol, and HDL-C were significantly related to mortality of CABG patients (All P < 0.05).
Discussion
This study investigated the associations of potential risk factors after CABG with death over around 6.5 years. The study indicated that age, diabetes, cigarette smoking, PVD, long length of stay in hospital, elevated TGs, total cholesterol, CRP, and HDL-C were significant contributing to increased mortality after CABG.
According to other studies, age is the most important predictor for death in long term among CABG candidates.[23] In our study, the case group was about 6.5 years older than control group because older patients generally are at higher risk of cardiac events than younger patients.[24] According to our results, an increase of age in 1 year in CABG patients increased odds of mortality by 8%. A large proportion of older patients with CABG often discontinues or takes the drugs inappropriately. A study indicated that older people failed to take medications as prescribed. These caused vulnerable older patients continue to be at high risk with poor outcomes. The useful recommendation for the vulnerable older patients is to identify poor adherence to medications in older patients. This problem must be elucidated through a multidisciplinary team effort including physicians, pharmacists, and nurses as well as staff at community-based centers.[25]
The prevalence of opium addiction in CABG patients is relatively high.[26] Our previous study showed that patient with positive history of opium use significantly experienced lower EF, higher creatinine level, and higher prevalence of MI.[27] In the current paper, the opium consumption rate in cases (25.5) was significantly higher than control (11.7) group (P = 0.039). Although the results of logistic regression for opium consumption showed relatively greater OR (2.57) to predict mortality, it was not statistically significant.
Our result suggests that patient with cigarette smoking had 1.67 times the odds of death than other CABG patients in 6.5-year period after surgery (P < 0.05).
A study by Asgary et al. showed that opium consumption has deleterious effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors including HDL, HbA1c, and CRP.[28] Studies suggest that the high level of CRP that was seen in opium addicts increased the risk for heart attack or stroke. Our findings are in line with other studies that higher level of CRP as an inflammatory biomarker is associated with increased risk of death.[29] This study revealed that diabetes mellitus as a major health problem in Iran is a strong predictor of death among CABG patients during 7 years. It is estimated that over one third of CABG patients have high levels of blood glucose which are in accordance with diabetes mellitus definition. These patients are more likely to experience acute MI compared to nondiabetics.[30] Various studies from different populations confirmed that diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease with 1.5–4-fold increased risk of death after CAD.[31] Previous studies have indicated significant positive association between elevated CRP levels and incident of diabetes. Some investigations have been shown an association between elevated glucose level and CRP. CRP is a marker of systemic inflammation that was found as additional risk factor for CHDs.[32] The cohort study by Jones et al. introduced CRP as a novel risk factor for CAD.[33]
Higher level of CRP as an inflammatory marker plays more important role in developing the risk of diabetes and its complication. Among CABG patients, inflammation is probably responsible for increased risk of death, especially in patients with diabetes.[34]
Our results showed that patients with a PVD history undergoing CABG had a mortality rate nearly 2.7 times as high as those without. The previous studies obtained similar findings found that CABG patients with a PVD history had about 20% 5 years.[35] Patients with a PVD history undergoing CABG had more coexistent risk factors.[36,37,38] The another study showed that these patients also exhibited higher rates of cardiac, systemic, and pulmonary complications.[36]
One possible limitation is that an important part of our cohort's questionnaire was dedicated to details of patients’ medications. Then, we categorized their medication into four groups of nitrates, statins, beta-blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers. However, most of our patients were under treatment with all these four groups. Outcome prediction was the focus of this paper with special emphasis on the mortality. Hence, we did not add them to our primary analysis assuming that they have not changed the outcome. The other limitation is the limited numbers of patients including into nested case–control study due to nature of methodological approach.
Conclusions
The study results indicated that age, diabetes, cigarette smoking, PVD, long length of stay in hospital, elevated TGs, total cholesterol, CRP, and HDL-C were significant contributing to increased mortality after CABG. It seems that vulnerable older patients continue to be at high risk with poor outcomes.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledged the contributions of Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
References
- 1.Hatmi ZN, Tahvildari S, Gafarzadeh Motlag A, Sabouri Kashani A. Prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors in Iran: A population based survey. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-7-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kulik A, Ruel M, Jneid H, Ferguson TB, Hiratzka LF, Ikonomidis JS, et al. Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131:927–64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S, Jr, Fuster V. Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 1999;100:1481–92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.13.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kelishadi R, Sadri G, Tavasoli AA, Kahbazi M, Roohafza HR, Sadeghi M, et al. Cumulative prevalence of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in Iranian adolescents: IHHP-HHPC. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2005;81:447–53. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alkhawam H, Nguyen J, Sayanlar J, Sogomonian R, Desai R, Jolly J, et al. Coronary artery disease in patients with body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2): A retrospective chart analysis. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6:31483. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.31483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Williams MA, Fleg JL, Ades PA, Chaitman BR, Miller NH, Mohiuddin SM, et al. Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the elderly (with emphasis on patients > or = 75 years of age): An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Circulation. 2002;105:1735–43. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000013074.73995.6c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery – Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:542–53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01788-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jones KW, Cain AS, Mitchell JH, Millar RC, Rimmasch HL, French TK, et al. Hyperglycemia predicts mortality after CABG: Postoperative hyperglycemia predicts dramatic increases in mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Diabetes Complications. 2008;22:365–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thiessen S, Vanhorebeek I, Van den Berghe G. Glycemic control and outcome related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015;29:177–87. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia: An independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:978–82. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.3.8341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Masoudkabir F, Sarrafzadegan N, Eisenberg MJ. Effects of opium consumption on cardiometabolic diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10:733–40. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khademi H, Malekzadeh R, Pourshams A, Jafari E, Salahi R, Semnani S, et al. Opium use and mortality in Golestan Cohort Study: Prospective cohort study of 50,000 adults in Iran. BMJ. 2012;344:e2502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Najafi M, Sheikhvatan M. Does analgesic effect of opium hamper the adverse effects of severe coronary artery disease on quality of life in addicted patients? Anesth Pain Med. 2012;2:22–7. doi: 10.5812/aapm.5139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Essebag V, Genest J, Jr, Suissa S, Pilote L. The nested case-control study in cardiology. Am Heart J. 2003;146:581–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00512-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1878–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Herlitz J, Wognsen GB, Karlson BW, Sjöland H, Karlsson T, Caidahl K, et al. Mortality, mode of death and risk indicators for death during 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with and without a history of diabetes mellitus. Coron Artery Dis. 2000;11:339–46. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200006000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Biesheuvel CJ, Vergouwe Y, Oudega R, Hoes AW, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Advantages of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamilton L. Statistics with Stata: Version 12. Duxbury Press: Cengage Learning; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cannon CP, Battler A, Brindis RG, Cox JL, Ellis SG, Every NR, et al. American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2114–30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01702-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ajani UA, Gaziano JM, Lotufo PA, Liu S, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease by diabetes status. Circulation. 2000;102:500–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.5.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV [Internet] 4th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bartnik M, Rydén L, Ferrari R, Malmberg K, Pyörälä K, Simoons M, et al. The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe. The Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1880–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: Awareness and treatment of uncontrolled hypertension among adults – United States, 2003-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:703–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kimura T, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Shizuta S, Ehara N, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era. Circulation. 2008;118(14 Suppl):S199–209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Flather M, Rhee JW, Boothroyd DB, Boersma E, Brooks MM, Carrié D, et al. The effect of age on outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery compared with balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stent implantation among patients with multivessel coronary disease. A collaborative analysis of individual patient data from 10 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2150–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Borghi C, Tartagni E. The older patient with hypertension: Care and cure. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2012;3:231–6. doi: 10.1177/2040622312452189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Najafi M, Sheikhvatan M, Montazeri A, Sheikhfathollahi M. Quality of life in opium-addicted patients with coronary artery disease as measured with WHOQOL-BREF. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009;55:247–56. doi: 10.1177/0020764008093600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Najafi M, Jahangiry L, Mortazavi SH, Jalali A, Karimi A, Bozorgi A. Outcomes and long-term survival of coronary artery surgery: The controversial role of opium as risk marker. World J Cardiol. 2016;8:676–83. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i11.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Asgary S, Sarrafzadegan N, Naderi GA, Rozbehani R. Effect of opium addiction on new and traditional cardiovascular risk factors: Do duration of addiction and route of administration matter? Lipids Health Dis. 2008;7:42. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-7-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh SK, Suresh MV, Voleti B, Agrawal A. The connection between C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis. Ann Med. 2008;40:110–20. doi: 10.1080/07853890701749225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Esteghamati A, Abbasi M, Nakhjavani M, Yousefizadeh A, Basa AP, Afshar H. Prevalence of diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors in an Iranian population with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006;5:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-5-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bulugahapitiya U, Siyambalapitiya S, Sithole J, Idris I. Is diabetes a coronary risk equivalent? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2009;26:142–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02640.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286:327–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.3.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jones R, Hardy R, Sattar N, Deanfield JE, Hughes A, Kuh D, et al. Novel coronary heart disease risk factors at 60-64 years and life course socioeconomic position: The 1946 British birth cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238:70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang Z, Hoy WE. C-reactive protein and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in Aboriginal Australians. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Loponen P, Taskinen P, Laakkonen E, Nissinen J, Peltola T, Wistbacka JO, et al. Peripheral vascular disease as predictor of outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:160–5. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Collison T, Smith JM, Engel AM. Peripheral vascular disease and outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1214–8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
