Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Coron Artery Dis. 2017 May;28(3):198–208. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000458

Table 3. Relationship between variations of atherothrombotic volume and indices of coronary physiology.

Correlation are expresses by rho Spearman’s coefficient. p< 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Cells containing statistical significant correlations are highlighted in red. (∆ATV: delta athero-thrombotic volume; ∆CFR ; ATV: athero-thrombotic colume; CFR: coronary flow reserve; FFR: fractional flow reserve; IMR: index of microcirculatory resistance; PFATV: prolapsed+floating atherothrombotic volume; ∆CFR ; delta CFR; ∆FFR : delta FFR; ∆IMR: delta IMR)

∆ATV (ATV – PFATV) [Method II]
rho p
∆FFR (FFRpre-stenting –FFRpost-stenting) -0.22 0.28
∆CFR (CFRpre-stenting –CFRpost-stenting) 0.20 0.34
∆IMR (IMRpre-stenting –IMRpost-stenting) -0.53 0.007
∆ATV (ATV – PFATV) [Method III]
rho p
∆FFR (FFRpre-stenting –FFRpost-stenting) - 0.25 0.23
∆CFR (CFRpre-stenting –CFRpost-stenting) - 0.14 0.50
∆IMR (IMRpre-stenting –IMRpost-stenting) -0.54 0.005