Skip to main content
. 2017 May;139(5):e20161688. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1688

TABLE 4.

Adjusted Regression Coefficients (β) and 95% CIs for Association of FCR Checklist Element Performance With Parent Perceptions of Safety (n = 298 Admissions)

FCR Checklist Element β (95% CI)
Overall Safety Staff Communication Openness Family Communication Openness Handoffs and Transitions
Nurse present −0.03 (−0.33 to 0.27) −0.01 (−0.31 to 0.29) 0.20 (−0.06 to 0.45) 0.07 (−0.32 to 0.46)
Introductions made −0.15 (−0.36 to 0.06) −0.14 (−0.35 to 0.07) −0.12 (−0.30 to 0.06) −0.11 (−0.38 to 0.17)
Assessment provided 0.17 (−0.03 to 0.36) 0.18 (−0.02 to 0.38) 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) 0.27 (0.02 to 0.53)a
Plan summarized 0.03 (−0.67 to 0.73) 0.39 (−0.32 to 1.10) −0.19 (−0.79 to 0.41) 0.04 (−0.87 to 0.95)
Family was asked for questions 0.07 (−0.17 to 0.31) 0.38 (0.14 to 0.62)a 0.09 (−0.11 to 0.29) 0.32 (0.01 to 0.62)a
Health care team was asked for questions 0.00 (−0.21 to 0.21) 0.01 (−0.20 to 0.23) −0.02 (−0.20 to 0.16) 0.07 (−0.20 to 0.33)
Discharge goals discussed 0.12 (−0.23 to 0.47) −0.05 (−0.40 to 0.31) 0.02 (−0.28 to 0.32) 0.23 (−0.23 to 0.68)
Orders were read back −0.04 (−0.27 to 0.19) −0.01 (−0.25 to 0.22) 0.08 (−0.11 to 0.28) 0.03 (−0.27 to 0.33)
a

Indicates P < .05. β describes the change in parent perceptions for each of the 4 safety domains associated with a 1% increase in the average percentage of FCRs in which the checklist element was performed during the child’s stay. Models included all participants across intervention arms both pre- and postintervention and were adjusted for child age, health status, length of stay, and parent education.