Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 20;10:941–949. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S129313

Table 2.

Data and statistical analyses

Scales TMG
Friedman analysis
SMG
Friedman analysis
TMG versus SMG p-values
T0 T1 T2 p-value T0 T1 T2 p-value T0 T1 T2
Coherence ratio 0.84±0.33 0.89±0.29 0.86±0.29 0.274 0.9±0.27 1.26±0.32 1.13±0.32 <0.001 0.393 <0.001 0.003
HRV 67.70±5.51 66.91±4.91 68.04±6.05 0.005 68.81±4.01 66.48±3.73 67.44±3.45 <0.001 0.392 0.401 0.457
VAS 4.80±0.95 2.53±1.45 2.66±1.48 <0.001 4.82±0.87 1.39±0.89 1.87±1.24 <0.001 0.917 0.005 0.098
Waddell 3.58±1.47 2.41±1.58 2.66±1.37 0.001 3.51±1.34 1.51±1.12 1.88±1.25 <0.001 0.869 0.034 0.044
McGill Tot 29.52±4.34 22.10±6.00 24.01±6.25 <0.001 33.17±11.05 15.11±8.24 18.01±8.09 <0.001 0.124 0.001 0.004
MAIA 23.3±3.87 25.48±4.31 24.96±3.86 <0.001 22.59±4.13 27.78±3.39 26.76±3.68 <0.001 0.546 0.024 0.097
SF-12 PCS 40.88±7.85 44.10±8.14 42.30±9.31 0.011 40.95±5.77 47.40±5.19 44.91±7.85 <0.001 0.858 0.141 0.308
SF-12 MCS 44.73±8.92 47.15±8.55 46.89±8.09 0.033 43.32±7.45 48.42±4.73 47.93±6.47 <0.001 0.417 0.895 0.985

Notes: Within-group analyses were performed using Friedman’s analysis for the two groups at the 3 evaluation times. Between-group statistical analyses were reported in the last 3 columns and refer to p-values of Mann–Whitney U test between (TMG versus SMG) groups for pain (VAS; Waddel Index, McGill Tot), quality of life (SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS), interoceptive awareness (MAIA Tot), HRV and coherence ratio. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is shown in bold (p<0.05 or p<0.025).

Abbreviations: TMG, traditional massage therapy group; SMG, experimental massage therapy group; HRV, heart rate variability; VAS, visual analog scale; Tot, total; MAIA, Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire; SF-12 PCS, Short Form - 12 health survey – physical health scale; MCS, mental health scale; T0, baseline; T1, end of the treatment program; T2, 3-month follow-up.