Table 1.
Condition | Absorbance Measure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Frequency Band | Sweep Condition | Tail Pressure (daPa) | Mean Peak-to-Tail Difference | SE | Mean Peak -to-Tail
Difference Test-retest |
SE |
Low Pass | ||||||
AtD | +200 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
AtU | +200 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
AtD | −300 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
AtU | −300 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
High pass | ||||||
AtD | +200 | −0.06 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | |
AtU | +200 | −0.08 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
AtD | −300 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
AtU | −300 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
Results are shown for downswept and upswept tympanograms averaged over a low-frequency pass band (0.376 to 2.0 kHz) or high-frequency pass band (2.0 to 8.0 kHz). The data were averaged over single sessions for 57 ears. A positive value indicates that the peak of the frequency-averaged absorbance tympanogram was greater than the tail. Also shown are the mean absolute value of the test-retest differences for peak-to-tail-differences and SEs for 45 ears with two tests performed about one month apart.