Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2017 May-Jun;38(3):e180–e192. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000395

Table 3.

Mean percentage of words for which children achieved the isolation point (IP: n= 16 per group) and acceptance point (AP: n = 13 per group) by predictability condition. Comparisons are from the mixed-design analyses of variance.

CNH
 CHH
 Comparisons
HP LP HP LP Between
Condition		 Between
Group
Dependent
Variable		 M
(SD)		 M
(SD)		 M
(SD)		 M
(SD)		 p η2p p η2p
IP 99.17
(3.33)		 94.17
(10.29)		 99.17
(2.28)		 95.42
(5.29)		 .001 .34 .74 .01
AP 97.44
(9.24)		 84.10
(19.72)		 98.46
(2.92)		 84.62
(21.49)		 .001 .39 .88 .001

Note: CNH = children with normal hearing; CHH = children who are hard of hearing; HP = high predictability condition; LP = low predictability condition