Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;18:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.028

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A comparison between the BCM and BPRC datasets and inter-individual variations of the urine proteome. (a) Correlations of 2.5th, 25th, Median (50th), 75th, and 95th percentile values calculated from only non-zero quantification values (iFOT5) of proteins (1770) commonly identified in at least 10% of samples in both BCM and BPRC datasets. (b) Correlations of 2.5th, 25th, Median (50th), 75th, and 95th percentile values calculated from both zero and non-zero quantification values (iFOT5) of proteins (1770) commonly identified in at least 10% of samples in both BCM and BPRC datasets. (c) Inter-individual variations of urine proteomes from 5 datasets including BCM (17 donors, 319 urine proteomes), BPRC (150 donors, 178 urine proteomes), BCM plus BPRC (167 donors, 497 urine proteomes), female (69 donors, 154 urine proteomes), and male (98 donors, 343 urine proteomes) datasets.