Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 8;31(5):419–436. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663856

Table 3.

Methods used for the identification and invitation of participants and details of who provided consent for participation.

All studies, n (%) Evaluating an intervention (n = 71, 33%) Assessing quality of life (n = 22, 10%) Observing course of illness (n = 36, 17%) Exploring views or perspectives (n = 60, 28%) Evaluating current practice (n = 26, 12%)
Identification of participants – method
 Medical records 25 (12) 5 (7) 2 (9) 5 (14) 9 (15) 4 (15)
 Clinic attendance 20 (9) 2 (3) 2 (9) 3 (8) 10 (17) 3 (12)
 Database/registry 19 (9) 3 (4) 4 (18) 2 (6) 5 (8) 5 (19)
 Participation in previous research 7 (3) 1 (5) 3 (8) 2 (3) 1 (4)
 Other 7 (3) 2 (2) 1 (5) 3 (5) 1 (4)
 Not reported 137 (64) 59 (83) 12 (55) 23 (64) 31 (52) 12 (46)
Identification of participants – person
 Physician 26 (12) 3 (14) 3 (8) 17 (28) 3 (12)
 Researcher 10 (5) 1 (1) 1 (5) 1 (3) 1 (2) 6 (23)
 Nurse 5 (2) 1 (5) 3 (5) 1 (4)
 Other 11 (5) 2 (2) 3 (14) 5 (8) 1 (4)
 Not reported 163 (76) 68 (96) 14 (64) 32 (89) 34 (57) 15(58)
Invitation of participants – method
 Letter 37 (17) 8 (36) 20 (33) 9 (35)
 In person 22 (10) 2 (3) 2 (9) 2 (6) 11 (18) 5 (19)
 Email 1 (1) 1 (2)
 Telephone 2 (1) 2 (4)
 Other 7 (4) 1 (5) 1 (3) 3 (5) 2 (8)
 Not reported 146 (68) 69 (97) 11 (50) 33 (92) 23 (38) 10 (39)
Invitation of participants – person
 Researcher 20 (9) 3 (4) 1 (5) 1 (3) 10 (17) 5 (19)
 Physician 10 (5) 7 (12) 3 (12)
 Nurse 8 (4) 1 (5) 6 (10) 1 (4)
 Other 12 (6) 2 (2) 2 (9) 1 (3) 5 (8) 2 (8)
 Not reported 165 (77) 66 (93) 18 (82) 34 (94) 32 (53) 15 (58)
Consenting of participants
 Parents only 109 (50) 34 (48) 10 (46) 18 (50) 37 (62) 10 (39)
 CYP only 4 (2) 1 (1) 1 (5) 2 (3)
 Parents and CYP 52 (24) 14 (20) 2 (9) 11 (31) 5 (8) 7 (27)
 Parents and siblings 2 (1) 1 (5) 1 (2) 1 (4)
 Siblings 2 (1) 1 (2) 1 (4)
 Parents, siblings and CYP 1 (1) 1 (2)
 Not reported 48 (22) 19 (27) 6 (27) 6 (17) 10 (17) 7 (27)

CYP: children and young people.