Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 8;31(5):419–436. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663856

Table 4.

Recruitment rates, numbers of participants screened, found to be eligible, approached and consented in all studies.

All studies, n (%) Evaluating an intervention (n = 71, 33%) Assessing quality of life (n = 22, 10%) Observing course of illness (n = 36, 17%) Exploring views or perspectives (n = 60, 28%) Evaluating current practice (n = 26, 12%)
Numbers of potential participants screened
 <50 7 (3) 4 (6) 1 (3) 1 (2) 1 (4)
 50–100 8 (4) 2 (3) 1 (5) 2 (6) 1 (2) 2 (8)
 101–1000 29 (14) 10 (14) 4 (18) 5 (15) 7 (12) 3 (12)
 >1000 5 (2) 2 (3) 2 (6) 1 (4)
 Not reported 166 (77) 53 (75) 17 (77) 26 (72) 51 (85) 19 (73)
Percentage of eligible participants out of those screened
 0–50 10 (5) 5 (7) 1 (5) 2 (6) 1 (2) 2 (8)
 51–100 31 (15) 10 (16) 3 (14) 6 (17) 4 (7) 7 (27)
 Not reported 173 (80) 55 (77) 18 (81) 16 (44) 55 (92) 17 (65)
Proportion approached out of those eligible (%)
 0–50
 51–100 55 (26) 18 (25) 5 (23) 8 (22) 16 (26) 8 (31)
 Not reported 160 (74) 53 (75) 17 (77) 28 (78) 44 (73) 18 (69)
Proportion consented out of those approached (%)
 0–50 13 (6) 3 (4) 1 (5) 5 (9) 4 (16)
 51–100 69 (32) 24 (34) 5 (23) 13 (72) 18 (29) 8 (34)
 Not reported 133 (62) 44 (62) 16 (73) 21 (58) 37 (62) 14 (54)
Recruitment rate (percentage recruited out of those eligible)
 0–50 15 (7) 8 (11) 2 (10) 2 (6) 1 (2) 2 (8)
 51–100 34 (16) 12 (17) 4 (18) 7 (19) 6 (10) 5 (19)
 Not reported 166 (77) 51 (72) 16 (73) 27 (75) 53 (88) 19 (73)