Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Small. 2016 Feb 22;12(15):1968–1992. doi: 10.1002/smll.201503396

Table 4.

Comparison of different fluorescent nanoparticles and organic dyes.a

organic dyes quantum dots Conjugated polymer NPs dye-loaded polymer NPs
Diameterb ~1 nm 6-60 nm 5-50 nm 15-100 nm
Monodispersity + + +/- +/-
Brightness (ε×QY) 103-105 105-106 105-108 105-108
Photostabilityc 105-106 107-108 106-109 4.4×107 d
Absorption range UV-vis-NIR UV-vis-NIR UV-vis UV-vis-NIR
Emission range UV-vis-NIR vis-NIR UV-vis-NIR UV-vis-NIR
Blinking yes/no Yes yes/no yes/no
Surface chemistry and colloidal stability + + +/- +/-
Biodegradability + - - +
a

“+”– an advantage; “+/-“ – to be improved; “-“– a weak point

b

hydrodynamic diameter

c

number of photons before photobleaching

d

data from one report.[87]