Table 5.
Indicated n^ (%) | Reported n+ (%) | Mean (SD) | Median | Inter-quartile range (25–75) | Missing n (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In last 3 months of life | ||||||
Help from others | ||||||
Nursing home/private care home | 82 (5.5) | 74 (4.9) | 3138.58 (3384.28) | 2000.00 | 487.50–5000 | 1422 (94.5) |
Privately employing nurse/carer | 67 (4.5) | 63 (4.2) | 1785.90 (2979.05) | 500.00 | 160–1500 | 1437 (95.5) |
Child care | 22 (1.5) | 21 (1.4) | 545.90 (566.73) | 400.00 | 100–852 | 1482 (98.5) |
Odd jobs not normally paid for | 250 (16.6) | 244 (16.2) | 371.74 (901.14) | 150.00 | 60–337.5 | 1254 (83.4%) |
Respite/holidays/day trips | 129 (8.6) | 125 (8.3) | 780.08 (1085.06) | 350.00 | 150–1000 | 1375 (91.4) |
Direct expenses | ||||||
Medical equipment/care supplies | 390 (25.9) | 377 (25.1) | 289.10 (907.79) | 100.00 | 50–200 | 1114 (74.1) |
Prescription/non-prescription drugs | 128 (8.5) | 119 (7.9) | 107.47 (279.26) | 30.00 | 20–80 | 1376 (91.5) |
Household bills | 410 (27.3) | 363 (24.1) | 235.62 (395.03) | 129.00 | 80–300 | 1094 (72.7) |
Travel expenses | 760 (50.6) | 720 (47.9) | 208.20 (424.17) | 100.00 | 48.5–207.5 | 744 (49.5) |
Meals/snacks while out | 670 (44.6) | 631 (42.0) | 113.10 (213.40) | 50.00 | 30–100 | 834 (55.5) |
Extra food/supplements/vitamins | 323 (21.5) | 296 (19.7) | 123.03 (313.98) | 55.00 | 30–120 | 1181 (78.5) |
Other | 194 (12.8) | 179 (11.9) | 602.27 (1481.12) | 150.00 | 60–400 | 1310 (87.1) |
Total spend (sum)a | – | 1090 (72.5) | 1025.00 (2024.75) | 370.00 | 150–919 | 414 (27.5) |
Any time since diagnosis | ||||||
One-off expense | 254 (16.9) | 240 (16.0) | 8759.84 (44902.50) | 2000 | 756.25–5875 | 1250 (83.1) |
NB: Indicated n – participants who indicated they did spend money on that item. Total who indicated spending money in last 3 months of life is n = 1145 (76.1%); total missing data n = 359 (23.9%).
Reported n – participants who reported the amount they spent on that item – for ‘one-off expenses’ respondents reported up to three expenses, which were totalled.
A large proportion of missing data is likely to be systematic, rather than missing due to incomplete reporting, as participants were not asked to indicate if they had not spent money.
Only those who reported spending money were included.