Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;8:632. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00632

Table 1.

Experimental design for each of the comparisons performed between Garnacha Tinta clones.

Comparison Clone 1 Clone 2 Significant phenotypic differences (P < 0.05) three seasons Organ sampled Sampling stage (modified E-L) Pair-wise comparison code
G1 1134 (C) 368 (L) N° berries, Berry size Flowers End of flowering (E-L 26) G1-26
Berries Start of véraison (E-L 34) G1-34
G2 1134 (C) 1154 (L) N° berries, N° seeds Flowers End of flowering (E-L 26) G2-26
G3 906 (C) 368 (L) N° berries Flowers End of flowering (E-L 26) G3-26
G4 906 (C) 1154 (L) N° berries, N° seeds Spring buds Bud burst (E-L 03) G4-03
Flowers End of flowering (E-L 26) G4-26

Organs and sampling stages for transcriptomics analyses were chosen based on the stable phenotypic differences found in three seasons. C, Compact clone; L, Loose clone.