Table 3.
Authors | Training Method | Participants | Highlights of Significant
Results (Note: Areas of overlap between improvements in communication skills demonstrated in our study and other studies are italicized. Bracketed numbers after skill items correspond to similar skills assessed by our measures.) |
---|---|---|---|
Gorniewicz, Floyd, Krishnan, Bishop, Tudiver, and Lang (2016) | Self-directed PowerPoint-based training module
incorporating cancer patient videos (1 hour) Total time: 1 hour |
Students (medical, nursing, and pharmacy) and Medical Residents (family medicine and internal medicine) |
Student group Colon cancer OSCE:
Colon cancer OSCE
|
[25) Lienard, Merckaert, Libert, et al. (2010) | Lecture and small groups w/ role-playing and
feedback Total time: 40 hours |
Medical Residents |
Open question [6] (p
< .001; RR = 5.79) Open directive questions [6] (p = .003; RR = 1.71) Empathy [2,4] (p = .017; RR = 4.50) Fewer medical words [1] (p < .001; RR = .74) Less information transmission (p = .001; RR = 0.72) |
[29] Szmuilowicz, el-Jawahri, Chiappetta, et. al (2010) | Lecture and small groups w/ role playing and
feedback Total time: 5 hours |
Medical Residents (internal medicine PGY 2) | Responding to emotion - overall score [2-4] (p = .03) |
[30] Daetwyler, Cohen, Gracely, et. al (2010) | doc.com online BBN module (1 hour) +
WebEncounter OSCE (10 minutes) w/feedback (10 minutes) Total time: 1.3 hours |
Medical Residents | BBN skills checklist summary score [1-7] (p = .018) |
[31] Merckaert, Lienard, Libert, et. al (2013) | Lecture and small groups, role-playing and
feedback (30 hours) + stress management training (10
hours) Total time: 40 hours |
Medical Residents (oncology, gynecology, and others) |
Supportive utterances: acknowledgement
[2,4] (p < .001; RR
=1.58) Open directive questions [6] (p < .001; RR =2.14) Decrease in use of medical words by residents [1] (p < .001; RR = 0.81) Checking questions [7] (p = .034; RR =1.66) Decrease in procedural information utterance by residents (p < .047; RR = 0.83) Longer “pre-delivery phase” (p < .001; RR = 3.04) Shorter “post-delivery phase” (p < .001; RR = 0.93) |
[32] Fujimori, Shirai, Asai, et. al (2014) | Orientation/ice-breaker (30 minutes) +
lecture w/ videos (1 hour) + small group role plays w/
discussion (8 hours) + summary session (30 minutes) Total time: 10 hours |
Oncologists (10 years of experience on average) |
Not beginning bad news without
preamble [1] (p <
.001) Checking to see that patient understands bad news [2,7] (p = .008) Communicating clearly main points of bad news [1] (p = .011) Checking questions [7] (p = .045) Providing reassurance and addressing patient's emotions with empathic Responses [2-4,6] (p = .011) Remaining silent out of concern for patient's feelings [2] (p = .005) Accepting patient's expression of emotions [3] (p < .001) Using words that soothe patient [2-4] (p = .005) Considering how to deliver bad news (p = .001) Setting up supportive environment for interview (p = .002) Greeting patient cordially (p <.001) Asking how much patient knows about his or her illness before breaking bad news (p = .024) Checking to see whether talk is fast paced (p = .005) Providing information on services and support (p = .002) Explaining second opinion (p = .012) |