Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 11;70(1):37–43. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.947

Table 2.

Characteristics of the comparative studies included in this section

Author Compared radiotracers Study type (year) Study group number Inclusion criteria PSA level, mean (±SD) Time window between PET/CT scans Detection rate
Schwenck [46] 68Ga-PSMA vs. 11C-choline retrospective (2016) 103 BCR 2.7 (median) 24 hours lymph nodes: 94% vs. 71%
bones: 98% vs. 64%
overall: 83% vs. 79%
Bluemel [44] 68Ga-PSMA vs. 18F-choline retrospective (2016) 125 BCR 5.4 (±12.73) 51 days 18F-choline: 74.4%
68Ga-PSMA in 18F-choline(-) scans: 43.8%
overall: 85.6%
Pfister [45] 68Ga-PSMA vs. 18F-choline retrospective (2016) 66 BCR 2.7 and 2.35 (median) n/a per-patient analysis:
PPV: 78.9% vs. 82.1%
per-lesion analysis:
PPV: 67.3% vs. 75.7%
NPV: 88.8% vs. 96.6%
ACC: 82.5% vs. 91.9%
Morigi [11] 68Ga-PSMA vs. 18F-choline prospective (2015) 38 BCR 1.72 (±2.54) 30 days PSA level <0.5: 50% vs. 12.5%
PSA level 0.5-2.0: 71% vs. 36%
PSA level >2.0: 88% vs. 63%
overall: 66% vs. 32%
Afshar-Oromieh [43] 68Ga-PSMA vs. 18F-choline retrospective (2014) 37 BCR 11.1 (±24.1) 30 days PSA level ≤2.82: 68.8% vs. 43.5%
PSA level >2.82: 100% vs. 90.5%
overall: 86.5% vs. 70.3%

ACC – accuracy; BCR – biochemical recurrence; NPV – negative predictive value; PPV – positive predictive value

All PSA levels are given in ng/ml