. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Feb 1;31(5):487–493. doi: 10.1177/1545968317693111

Table 2.

Performance evaluation metrics

		S1	S2	S3	S4	S5	S6	S7	S8	All	%improved
Movement time (sec)	Session1	9·53±7·80	3·85±1·43	5·71±4·82	3·64±1·77	8·92±6·55	5·21±2·13	9·58±5·59	10·25±7·17	7·12±5·78	64%
Movement time (sec)	Session24	4·27±2·23	1·74±0·75	2·60±0·72	1·77±0·92	1·89±0·49	3·29±1·24	3·09±1·77	1·79±0·43	2·58±1·51	64%

										F_(1,7)=39.45, p<0·001

Movement error (cm)	Session1	5·81±5·24	4·00±3·14	10·76±28·4	3·70±3·72	5·63±3·82	6·42±4·67	7·72±6·27	4·86±2·97	6·09±10·8	71%
Movement error (cm)	Session24	3·15±1·90	0·71±0·65	1·88±1·35	1·03±1·02	1·20±1·36	3·07±2·73	1·92±1·45	0·92±0·81		71%

										F_(1,7)=48.91, p<0·001

Aspect ratio^*	Session1	1·02±0·82	0·58±0·28	0·90±2·15	0·33±0·21	0·69±0·60	0·51±0·41	0·63±0·33	0·98±1·25	0·71±0·99	66%
Aspect ratio^*	Session24	0·37±0·19	0·18±0·10	0·19±0·21	0·16±0·06	0·19±0·11	0·40±0·26	0·29±0·10	0·14±0·08	0·24±0·18	66%

										F_(1,7)=44.34, p<0·001

Normalized jerk^*^°	Session1	21·30±33·9	1·66±1·05	5·71±11·4	1·28±1·34	10·81±15·2	2·89±2·32	11·09±15·5	15·03±20·3	8·81±17·6	90%
Normalized jerk^*^°	Session24	2·73±2·55	0·32±0·32	0·46±0·29	0·42±0·65	0·29±0·16	1·21±0·93	1·28±1·94	0·20±0·13	0·89±1·47	90%

										F_(1,7)=35.13, p<0·001

Pong hit rate (min⁻¹)	Session3		2·00±1·12	4·50±0·94	5·90±2·58	5·00±0·79	8·50±2·03	3·80±0·97	7·10±1·82	5·26±2·15	73%
Pong hit rate (min⁻¹)	Session24		16·90±10·8	11·10±3·66	15·90±3·13	26·00±4·31	16·90±1·52	12·00±2·24	38·30±8·97	19·59±9·57	73%

										t=4·24, p=0·006

Typing rate (char/min)	Session3	7·31		13·16	15·18	3·92	8·02	2·32	10·01	8·56±4·64	42%
Typing rate (char/min)	Session24	11·55		14·00	16·53	12·68	12·78	16·33	18·82	14·67±2·62	42%

										t=3·44, p=0·014

mean±standard deviation

value is smaller for straighter movements

^°

unit: ×10³