Further randomized trials should be conducted in nursing care facilities and possibly community settings for high risk groups |
Participants in clinical trials of hip protectors should be at high risk (annual incidence >3%) of proximal femoral fracture—suggested indicators are history of bone fragility fracture, low weight, functional impairment, increased fall risk, and older age |
Hip protectors used in clinical trials should have been assessed using agreed international testing methods |
“Sham” hip protectors should be used with intra-individual randomization (i.e., on random basis the same person has an “active” protector on one hip and a “sham” protector on the other), and, in an ideal study design, a randomized comparison group without any protector should be used to clarify whether the use of hip protectors affects the general risk of hip fracture |
A “run-in” period prior to the clinical trial should occur with adequate adherence to be demonstrated |
Falls and, ideally, fall directionality should be monitored |
Adherence should be monitored by research staff across day- and nighttime hours |
Economic analyses should be included in future clinical trials of hip protectors |