Table 4. Root Al uptake (μg g-1) of seven rice genotypes under four different aluminum concentrations in hydroponic assay at 48 h.
Rice varieties Al(μM) |
Root Al uptake (μg/g DW) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
Disang | 36.46 ± 13.77 | 151.04 ± 18.78* | 223.95 ± 23.15* | 302.08 ± 18.77* |
Swrna sub 1C | 41.66 ± 18.78 | 223.96 ± 34.15* | 328.13 ± 32.52* | 437.5 ± 72.16* |
Naveen | 41.67 ± 10.41 | 260.42 ± 37.55* | 406.25 ± 18.04* | 484.37 ± 9.02* |
Cauveri | 46.88 ± 9.02 | 250.00 ± 32.52* | 437.50 ± 41.33* | 500.00 ± 18.04* |
CR Dhan 601 | 36.46 ± 10.41 | 354.17 ± 49.68* | 416.67 ± 61.40* | 541.67 ± 37.55* |
Tulsi Joha | 52.08 ± 18.77 | 364.58 ± 10.41* | 442.70 ± 13.78* | 562.50 ± 9.02* |
Joymati | 62.50 ± 9.02 | 458.33 ± 28.99* | 572.92 ± 10.71* | 630.21 ± 18.77* |
Data presented are mean ± S.E (n = 3). Significant mean difference between control and stress plants were significant at P < 0.05 (*) by Tukey test.