Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0176391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176391

Table 2. Enriched pathways based on the islet proteomics data set from a single donor.

Name Total Entities Expanded # of Entities Overlap Percent Overlap p-value
Insulin Action 50 912 242 26 5.00E-47
EphrinR -> actin signaling 15 216 49 22 9.49E-18
Mitochondrial Protein Transport 25 111 45 40 1.82E-16
Actin Cytoskeleton Assembly 31 55 28 50 1.19E-13
B Cell Activation 62 847 159 18 6.74E-13
Tight Junction Assembly (Occludin) 38 294 69 23 9.14E-11
Ubiquitin-dependent Protein Degradation 15 125 38 30 1.26E-09
rRNA Transcription and Processing 35 292 58 19 1.96E-06
Notch Pathway 40 1487 214 14 4.38E-06
Adipocytokine Signaling 52 792 122 15 5.05E-05
Presentation of Endogenous Peptide Antigen 16 69 19 27 9.30E-05
Cell Cycle Regulation 135 2179 275 12 0.00346734
SomatostatinR -> ATF1/TP53 signaling 8 26 6 23 0.00731706
VasopressinR2 -> STAT signaling 7 7 3 42 0.00946125
FSHR -> CREB/ELK-SRF/GATA4 signaling 29 88 12 13 0.0159035
IGF1R -> STAT signaling 9 9 3 33 0.0204864
InsulinR -> STAT signaling 9 9 3 33 0.0204864
GlucagonR -> CREB/ELK-SRF/SP1 signaling 20 42 7 16 0.0233242
FSHR -> FOXO1A signaling 9 54 8 14 0.0302631

Enriched pathways identified using all proteins detected (n = 1429) in one of the donors. Proteins were uploaded into Pathway Studio and pathways with a p-value of less than 0.05 identified. “Total” refers to the total number of nodes in the pathway, some of which may be complex/container entities e.g. containing numerous proteins that are all of one functional class; “Expanded # of” refers to the total number of child concepts contained within the complex entities; “Overlap” refers to the number of proteins detected in the experimental dataset which overlap with the child concepts; “Percent” refers to the percentage of complex/container entities in which at least one experimental protein was detected.