Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;20(7):1297–1305. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003074

Table 4.

Purchase of fresh fruits and vegetables (F/V) by store customers who participated in exit interviews in Chelsea, MA, USA, June 2013–April 2014

Baseline (Jun–Oct 2013) Intervention period (Dec 2013–Apr 2014) Difference P value for difference in differences
All survey participants (n 575)
Purchased fresh F/V (%)
Control stores 36 32 −4 0·29
Intervention stores 15 16 1
Planned to purchase F/V (%)
Control stores 38 32 −6 0·11
Intervention stores 20 20 0
Survey participants on WIC (n 134)§
Purchased fresh F/V (%)
Control stores 41 39 −2 0·11
Intervention stores 18 36 18
Planned to purchase F/V (%)
Control stores 45 39 −6 0·17
Intervention stores 22 37 15
Survey participants on SNAP (n 212)||
Purchased fresh F/V (%)
Control stores 41 26 −15 0·007
Intervention stores 16 22 6
Planned to purchase F/V (%)
Control stores 46 31 −15 <0·001
Intervention stores 21 24 3

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

P value adjusted for quintile of propensity score, whether the respondent was shopping primarily for food at that particular visit and for clustering at the store level.

No. of participants: control stores, n 141 during baseline and n 139 during the intervention period; intervention stores, n 145 during baseline and n 150 during the intervention period.

§

No. of participants: control stores, n 32 during baseline and n 38 during the intervention period; intervention stores, n 36 during baseline and n 28 during the intervention period.

||

No. of participants: control stores, n 51 during baseline and n 54 during the intervention period; intervention stores, n 57 during baseline and n 50 during the intervention period.