. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2016 Nov 30;40(3):434–444. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9812-0

Table 2.

Measurement model with standardized factor loadings and zero-order correlation coefficients among latent variables (N = 299)

	Factor loadings	SBχ²	df	p	RMSEA	CI_{.90, RMSEA}	TLI	SRMR	1	2	3	4	5
1. HIV Shame	0.42–0.91	139.34	58	<0.001	0.068	0.054–0.083	0.95	0.03	1.000
2. Dep	0.40–0.72	687.24	372	<0.001	0.053	0.047–0.059	0.87	0.06	0.566	1.000
3. Lon	0.50–0.81	60.99	30	0.001	0.059	0.037–0.080	0.97	0.05	0.488	0.681	1.000
4. PWB	0.41–0.86	107.64	61	<0.001	0.051	0.034–0.066	0.96	0.04	−0.351	−0.634	−0.475	1.000
5. EWB	0.46–0.80	60.68	30	0.001	0.058	0.037–0.080	0.96	0.04	−0.805^a	−0.742^b	−0.556	0.662	1.000
6. SWB	0.41–0.88	47.55	17	<0.001	0.078	0.052–0.104	0.96	0.04	−0.458	−0.519	−0.801^c	0.299	0.416

All correlations are statistically significant at α = 0.05. Satorra–Bentler Chi squared (SBχ²) difference testing comparing two-factor models of each pair of highly correlated latent variables to their respective, combined one-factor model showed discriminant validity as follows:

ΔSBχ²(1) = 209.89, p < 0.000;

ΔSBχ²(1) = 132.80, p < 0.0001;

ΔSBχ²(1) = 95.43, p < 0.0001

SBχ² Satorra–Bentler Chi squared statistic, Dep depression, Lon loneliness, PWB physical well-being, EWB emotional well-being, SWB social well-being