Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Oct 27;71:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.016

Table 2.

Means (Standard Deviations) of Corporal Punishment by Country and Year

Country and Year of Data Collection Corporal Punishment Severe Corporal Punishment Belief in Need to Use Corporal Punishment
Ukraine: Outlawed corporal punishment prior to Time 1
 2005 .37 (.48) .02 (.14) .14 (.34)
 2012 .32 (.47) .01 (.08) .10 (.30)
Togo: Outlawed corporal punishment between Times 1 and 2
 2006 .72 (.45) .26 (.44) .33 (.47)
 2010 .77 (.42) .17 (.38) .37 (.48)
Countries that outlawed corporal punishment after Time 2
Albania
 2005 .46 (.50) .08 (.27) .06 (.24)
 2008–9 .63 (.48) .19 (.39) .15 (.36)
Macedonia
 2005 .60 (.49)a .17 (.38) .08 (.27)
 2011 .55 (.50) .06 (.23) .03 (.17)
Countries that have not outlawed corporal punishment as of 2016
Central African Republic
 2006 .75 (.44) .33 (.47) .26 (.44)
 2010 .80 (.40) .37 (.48) .33 (.47)
Kazakhstan
 2006 .23 (.42) .01 (.09)a .07 (.26)a
 2010–11 .30 (.46) .01 (.12) .08 (.27)
Montenegro
 2005 .45 (.50) .06 (.23)a .05 (.23)a
 2013 .35 (.48) .03 (.17) .08 (.27)
Sierra Leone
 2005–6 .76 (.43) .23 (.42) .57 (.50)
 2009–10 .64 (.48) .18 (.39) .43 (.50)

Note. Items were coded 0 = no, 1 = yes, so means can be interpreted as the proportion of respondents within each country who reported that their child experienced corporal punishment in the last month or who reported believing it is necessary to use corporal punishment to rear a child properly. Analyses control for child gender and child age.

a

Time 1 mean does not significantly differ from Time 2 mean in the same country, p > .001.