Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Dec;19(6):1343–1350. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0468-1

Table 1.

Comparisons of men who were aware versus unaware of PSA screening status (N = 142)

Total sample (%) Unaware (n = 76) (%) Aware (n = 66) (%) p valuea
Immigrant
 No 17.6 17.1 18.2 .867
 Yes 82.4 82.9 81.8
Highest education achieved
 Post-secondary 37.3 25.0 51.5 .001
 ≤High school 62.7 75.0 48.5
Age group in years
 45–49 23.9 28.9 18.2 .373
 50–54 23.9 19.7 28.8
 55–59 28.2 28.9 27.3
 60–70 23.9 22.4 25.8
Married
 No 14.8 14.5 15.2 .910
 Yes 85.2 85.5 84.8
Comorbid conditions
 None 19.7 22.4 16.7 .394
 ≥1 80.3 77.6 83.3
Genitourinary symptoms
 Asymptomatic 64.1 59.2 69.7 .194
 Symptomatic 35.9 40.8 30.3
Plan to get tested for prostate cancer
 Yes 55.6 47.4 65.2 .033
 No 44.4 52.6 34.8
Prostate cancer knowledge
 >50 % correct 48.6 35.5 63.6 .001
 ≤50 % correct 51.4 64.5 36.4
Efficacy to discuss prostate cancer testing with physician
 High 46.5 38.2 56.1 .033
 Low 53.5 61.8 43.9
Physician recommended PSA test (T2)
 Yes 21.1 3.9 40.9 .001
 No 78.9 96.1 59.1
PSA decision making preferences (T2)
 Patient decision 16.2 21.1 10.6 .188
 Physician decision 5.6 6.6 5.6
 Physician-patient shared decision 78.2 72.4 84.8
a

Two-sided p values. Associations between awareness of PSA test being performed (no/yes) and categorical variables were calculated using Chi square analyses. Unless otherwise noted, variables measured at Time 1. T2 = Time 2