. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Dec;19(6):1343–1350. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0468-1

Table 2.

Multiple logistic regression model of factors predicting men being unaware (no/yes) of PSA screening status (N = 142)

	Adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI)	p value^a
Highest education achieved
Any college/post-secondary	Reference
≤High school	4.347 (1.723–10.970)	0.002
Plan to get tested for prostate cancer
Yes	Reference
No	3.356 (1.361–8.272)	0.009
Prostate cancer knowledge
>50 % correct	Reference
≤50 % correct	2.378 (1.040–5.434)	0.040
Efficacy to discuss prostate cancer testing with physician
High	Reference
Low	1.309 (0.572–2.994)	0.524
Physician recommended PSA test (T2)
Yes	Reference
No	24.574 (5.904–102.289)	0.000

R² = .29 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .33 (Cox & Snell), .44 (Nagelkerke). Model Chi Square (df = 5) = 56.15, p<.001

Two-sided p values. Unless otherwise noted, variables measured at Time 1. T2 = Time 2