Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2016 Nov 8;35(8):1743–1753. doi: 10.1002/jor.23468

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Anterior view of fringe plots showing differences in anatomy and mean cortical thickness for cam and control groups. (A) Mean shapes for the control (left) and cam (middle) groups shown with the shape difference mapped onto the mean control femur (right). (B) The region of the head–neck junction with greater than 1.5 mm of difference in the anatomy of the outer cortex was identified as the region of the cam lesion (right); thickness was evaluated for this region on the mean control (left) and cam (middle) shapes. (C) Mean cortical thickness of the control (left) and cam (middle) groups with the difference in mean thickness between groups (right). The greatest difference in thickness corresponded with the region of the cam lesion (right, inset). Note: The fringe plot in the inset has been re-scaled.