Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2016 Nov 8;35(8):1743–1753. doi: 10.1002/jor.23468

Table 2.

Median and Interquartile Range (IQR) of Subject Specific Maximum, Median, and Mean Regional and Median Proximal Femur Thickness for All Groups and Subgroups

Entire Cohort
Subject Subgroups
Median [IQR] adj. p Median [IQR] adj. p
Maximum regional thickness, mm
 Controls 2.30 [1.13] Male controls 2.62 [1.20]
Female controls 2.24 [0.59] 0.897
 Patients 3.47 [2.23] <0.001 Male patients 3.47 [2.50] 0.002
Female patients 2.88, 4.13 *
Mean regional thickness, mm
 Controls 1.18 [0.31] Male controls 1.17 [0.29]
Female controls 1.21 [0.38] 0.866
 Patients 1.71 [0.81] <0.001 Male patients 1.71 [0.79] <0.001
Female patients 1.15, 1.92 *
Median regional thickness, mm
 Controls 1.13 [0.22] Male controls 1.10 [0.19]
Female controls 1.13 [0.34] 0.568
 Patients 1.47 [0.64] <0.001 Male patients 1.47 [0.72] <0.001
Female patients 0.86, 1.63 *
Median proximal femur thickness, mm
 Controls 0.97 [0.22] Male controls 0.94 [0.22]
Female controls 0.99 [0.17] 0.544
 Patients 1.28 [0.30] <0.001 Male patients 1.25 [0.29] <0.001
Female patients 1.77, 1.28 *

IQR indicates variation within each group. Regional thickness was evaluated within the region of the cam lesion. p-values shown are relative to control and male control groups for the entire cohort and subject subgroups, respectively.

*

No statistical comparisons were made with the female patient group due to sample size (n=2).