Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Dec 7;31(5):857–862. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14051
Keller et al.19 Nakib et al.20
Country of origin Taiwan United States
Study design Retrospective cohort Prospective cohort
Year of publication 2012 2014
Cases Cases of periodontitis were identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database which included random sample of one million enrollees under the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program. The study included subjects with first diagnostic code of periodontitis between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2004. Subjects in this study needed to have at least 2 diagnostic codes of periodontitis in the database. Cases of periodontitis were identified from Nurses' Health Study cohort which was established in 1976. Subjects with self-reported history of periodontitis in the 1998 survey and were free of psoriasis at that time were included.
Comparators Comparators were sex, age and urbanization-matched. They were randomly recruited from the same database. Comparators were the rest of subjects in Nurses' Health Study cohort who did not have psoriasis and periodontitis.
Identification and verification of psoriasis Presence of diagnostic code for psoriasis was used to identify the diagnosis of psoriasis. No further verification was made. Self-reported physician–diagnosed psoriasis though health questionnaires that were mailed to the subjects every 2 years
Number of subjects (cases/comparators) 115,365 /115,365 11,358 /70,020
Percentage of female (cases/comparators) 52.1/52.1 100.0/100.0
Mean age in years (cases/comparators) 39.2/39.2 64.7/64.6
Follow up Medical records were tracked for 5 years after index date Until last health questionnaire in 2008
Confounder assessed Income, urbanization and geographic region Age, body mass index, smoking, alcohol and physical activity
Quality assessment (Newcastle – Ottawa scale) Selection: 4 stars
Comparability: 2 stars
Outcome: 3 stars
Selection: 3 stars
Comparability: 1 star
Outcome: 3 stars