Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2017 May;26(5):498–504. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000640

Table 3.

Multivariate regression testing the association between clinical parameters and the classification groups” glaucoma, suspects, and healthy subjects. Healthy subjects were set as reference.

Coefficient P 95% Confidence Interval
VCDR > 0.6
Suspect 0.66 <0.001 0.52 0.79
Glaucoma 0.88 <0.001 0.77 1.00
Focal neuroretinal rim thinning
Suspect 0.91 <0.001 0.77 1.05
Glaucoma 0.65 <0.001 0.53 0.77
Diffuse neuroretinal rim thinning
Suspect 0.08 NA* −0.06 0.23
Glaucoma 0.52 <0.001 0.40 0.65
Beta-zone PPA
Suspect 0.06 0.517 −0.12 0.24
Glaucoma 0.57 <0.001 0.41 0.72
Violation of ISNT Rule
Suspect 0.82 <0.001 0.67 0.96
Glaucoma 0.79 <0.001 0.67 0.91
Diffuse RNFL loss
Suspect 0.26 0.002 0.09 0.42
Glaucoma 0.60 <0.001 0.46 0.74
Focal RNFL loss
Suspect 0.47 <0.001 0.31 0.63
Glaucoma 0.26 <0.001 0.12 0.39
Nasal cupping
Suspect 0.08 NA* −0.04 0.21
Glaucoma 0.23 <0.001 0.12 0.34
*

The number of eyes in the suspect and healthy groups was too small for analysis.