Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;12:76. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0812-1

Table 1.

Results of dosimetric comparison for PTV from DVH (x¯±S)

Parameters HT VMAT IMRT 3D-CRT p-Value
HT VS. VMAT HT VS. IMRT HT VS. 3D-CRT VMAT VS. IMRT VMAT VS. 3D-CRT IMRT VS. 3D-CRT
D98% (Gy) 49.12 ± 0.19 47.43 ± 0.18 47.20 ± 0.10 47.50 ± 0.24 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.181 0.766 0.275
D2% (Gy) 52.42 ± 0.17 51.31 ± 0.11 51.62 ± 0.19 54.80 ± 0.47 0.000 0.004 0.001 0.055 0.000 0.000
Dmean (Gy) 51.41 ± 0.15 49.75 ± 0.10 49.72 ± 0.18 50.98 ± 0.12 0.000 0.000 0.056 0.862 0.000 0.001
V95%(%) 99.35 ± 0.19 97.82 ± 0.44 97.10 ± 0.25 97.74 ± 0.48 0.015 0.000 0.024 0.150 0.863 0.279
Cold spot volume (%) 0.42 ± 0.45 0.61 ± 0.37 0.88 ± 0.33 0.95 ± 0.22 0.367 0.036 0.107 0.047 0.105 0.773
CI95% 1.234 ± 0.024 1.075 ± 0.008 1.090 ± 0.007 1.493 ± 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.140 0.000 0.000
HI 0.043 ± 0.002 0.058 ± 0.003 0.065 ± 0.004 0.103 ± 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.066 0.000 0.002