Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 19;57(4):1197–1205. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161209

Table 3.

Logistic regression models of neuropsychological tests and driver screening tests as predictors of OT On-Road Test Safety Rating in the full sample

Models including all variables
Measure Model 1 Model 2
Beta p-value Beta p-value
CVLT Delayed Recall –0.06 (0.09) 0.51 0.04 (0.09) 0.65
Boston naming –0.05 (0.09) 0.56 –0.08 (0.09) 0.40
Digits Backwards –0.00 (0.00) 0.11 –0.00 (0.00) 0.10
BVRT (Copy) –0.10 (0.15) 0.52 –0.16 (0.16) 0.32
COWAT –0.03 (0.02) 0.11 –0.01 (0.02) 0.65
Trail Making Test B (s) 0.00 (0.00) 0.68 0.00 (0.00) 0.95
Stroop Color Word Test (s) 0.01 (0.01) 0.30 0.00 (0.01) 0.68
UFOV® Score (ms) 0.00 (0.00) 0.27
Multi-D 2.35 (0.81) <0.01**
DriveSafe Score –0.03 (0.02) 0.12
DriveSafe Intersections –0.22 (0.17) 0.20
14-Item Road Law 0.01 (0.06) 0.82
Maze Test Time (s) –1.09 (1.88) 0.56
Forward selection of best fitting model
Age –0.13 (0.05) <0.01**
DriveSafe Score –0.04 (0.02) 0.02*
Multi-D 1.78 (0.78) 0.02*

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Model 1 and 2 Results adjusted for age and gender. Note cut-off on ORT was 1–3/4–10 for unsafe/safe. CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test Immediate Recall; BVRT, Benton Visual Retention Test; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; UFOV®, Useful Field of View. Bold indicates are p-values.