Table 1.
Groups | Initial body weight, g | Final body weight, g | Infarcted area, % | HW/BW, mg/g | LV/BW, mg/g | RV/BW, mg/g | Pulmonary congestion, % | Hepatic congestion, % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sed-Sham | 217±12 | 323±32 | __ | 2.67±0.25† | 2.17±0.3 | 0.43±0.16 | 69.73±1.15 | 72.17±0.74 |
RMT-Sham | 211±8 | 302±30 | __ | 2.46±0.97* | 1.97±0.77 | 0.49±0.14 | 67.98±4.75 | 72.85±0.99 |
Sed-HF | 220±7 | 314±20 | 43.10+-4 | 3.46±0.4** | 2.58±0.2 | 1.05±0.22§ | 76.73±1.39§ | 72.83±1.23 |
RMT-HF | 218±13 | 314±30 | 45.12±9 | 3.34±0.54 | 2.52±0.43 | 0.72±0.22 | 68.23±4.68 | 71.64±1.93 |
Values are means ± SD. Groups were compared by the two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Sedentary sham rats (Sed-Sham; n=8); respiratory muscle training sham rats (RMT-Sham; n=8); sedentary heart failure rats (Sed-HF; n=7); respiratory muscle training heart failure rats (RMT-HF; n=7). HW/BW=heart weight-to-body weight ratio; LV/BW=left ventricle-to-body weight ratio; RV/ BW=right ventricle-to-body weight ratio.
P<0.05 compared with Sed-HF and RMT-HF
P<0.05 compared with RMT-HF.
P<0.01 compared with Sed-Sham.
P<0.01 compared with Sed-Sham, RMT-Sham and RMT-HF.