Table 2. Results of simulations varying coverage and sample numbers.
Number of samples per sequencing pool | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coverage per
sample in million (M) read pairs |
6 | 12 | 24 | 48 | 96 | |
1.25 | Sensitivity | 87% (0–100) | 92% (40–100) | 92% (60–100) | 91% (81–100) | 96% (94–100) |
Specificity | 98% (56–100) | 99% (89–100) | 99% (96–100) | 99% (98–100) | 99% (99–100) | |
2.5 | Sensitivity | 95% (0–100) | 98% (67–100) | 99% (83–100) | 100% (94–100) | 100% (100–100) |
Specificity | 97% (50–100) | 99% (89–100) | 99% (95–100) | 99% (98–100) | 99% (99–99) | |
3.125 | Sensitivity | 99% (67–100) | 99% (75–100) | 100% (100–100) | 100% (100–100) | 100% (100–100) |
Specificity | 97% (50–100) | 99% (94–100) | 100% (97–100) | 99% (99–100) | 99% (99–99) | |
5 | Sensitivity | 96% (0–100) | 99% (75–100) | 100% (100–100) | 100% (100–100) | 100% (100–100) |
Specificity | 97% (50–100) | 99% (84–100) | 99% (93–100) | 99% (96–100) | 99% (98–99) | |
7.5 | Sensitivity | 96% (0–100) | 99% (75–100) | 100% (89–100) | 100% (94–100) | 100% (100–100) |
Specificity | 97% (56–100) | 99% (84–100) | 99% (92–100) | 99% (96–100) | 99% (98–99) |