Table 1.
Quality assessment of included studies using adapted “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)” statement.
| Studies | Items | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 | #8 | #9 | #10 | Total | |
| Dieu et al. [25] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Huynh et al. [26] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Thongbai et al. [27] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Do et al. [28] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Do et al. [29] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Aziz et al. [30] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Sabanayagam et al. [31] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Yamborisut et al. [32] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Zaini et al. [33] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Serene et al. [34] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Wan et al. [35] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Tay et al. [36] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Gonzalez-Suarez et al. [37] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Soo et al. [38] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Note: #1. Is the study longitudinal? #2. Does the paper describe the participants’ eligibility criteria? #3. Were study participants randomly selected (or representative of the study population)? #4. Did the paper report information about the measures, including references used to assess parental feeding practices and/or children’s eating behaviors? #5. Did the study include information on instrument or scale used to assess parental feeding practices and/or child eating behaviors have acceptable reliability? #6. Did the paper report how overweight and obesity was assessed in children participating in the study? #7. Did the study provide information power calculation to detect hypothesized relationships? #8. Did the study report the number of individuals who completed each of the different measures? #9. Did the participants/respondents complete at least 80% of measures? #10. Did analyses take into account confounding factors?