Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 13;9(4):382. doi: 10.3390/nu9040382

Table 3.

Results of the vitamin B12 regression analysis.

Variables n I2 Adj R2 exp(b) Std. Err. t p 95% CI
Testing method 11 73.32% −1.84% 0.86 0.27 −0.47 0.654 * 0.43, 1.76
1.22 0.37 0.66 0.530 # 0.60, 2.47
0.67 0.16 −1.64 0.139 & 0.38, 1.18
Year of publication 15 84.87% 16.62% 0.96 0.02 −1.74 0.105 0.92, 1.01
Sample size 15 81.47% 12.78% 1.00 0.00 −1.58 0.139 0.99, 1.00
Quality of studies 15 82.38% 20.13% 0.78 0.10 −1.92 0.078 0.60, 1.03
Average age of patients 10 65.85% 55.42% 0.97 0.01 −2.73 0.026 0.95, 1.00

n: number; I2: percentage of total variation across studies; Adj R2: adjusted R2, the proportion of between-study variance; exp(b): the exponentiation of the B coefficient; Std. Err: standard error; t: t statistic, the coefficient divided by its standard error; p: an independent variable would be significant (<0.05) or not significant (≥0.05) in the model; CI: confidence interval; * chemiluminescence; # radioassay; & ELISA.