Table 4.

P-SSIS – Compensatory (i.e., Buffering) and Protective (i.e., Interaction) Effects

	B	S.E.	Wald	df	p	Odds Ratio	95.0% C.I. for Odds Ratio
							Lower	Upper
(a) The compensatory effect of activity breadth, in the presence of youth conduct problems
DBD – CD severity	−.468	.074	39.977	1	<.001	.626	.541	.724
Activity Breadth	.246	.076	10.485	1	.001	1.278	1.102	1.483
Constant	−.714	.431	2.744	1	.098	.490
(b) The compensatory effect of activity breadth, in the presence of negative parenting
APQ Negative Parenting	−.095	.020	21.568	1	<.001	.910	.874	.947
Activity Breadth	.227	.069	11.002	1	.001	1.255	1.097	1.435
Constant	1.617	.770	4.407	1	.036	5.038
(c) The protective effect of activity breadth, in the presence of youth conduct problems
DBD – CD severity	−.598	.241	6.152	1	.013	.550	.343	.882
Activity Breadth	.206	.101	4.144	1	.042	1.229	1.008	1.499
CD x Act. Breadth	.022	.039	.332	1	.564	1.023	.948	1.104
Constant	−.497	.571	.758	1	.384	.608
(d) The protective effect of activity breadth, in the presence of negative parenting
APQ Negative Parenting	.010	.059	.031	1	.861	1.010	.899	1.135
Activity Breadth	.918	.387	5.614	1	.018	2.504	1.172	5.350
Neg. Parent x Act.	−.020	.011	3.324	1	.068	.980	.959	1.002
Breadth
Constant	−1.950	2.074	.885	1	.347	.142

Note: P-SSIS = parent report on the Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scale; S.E. = standard error; df = degrees of freedom; APQ = Alabama Parenting Questionnaire; DBD = Disruptive Behavior Disorders rating scale; CD = conduct disorder; Act. Breadth = activity breadth; Neg. Parent = negative parenting.