Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;5:e3207. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3207

Table 1. Correlation between male Fis (♂Fis), Fst between sexes (♂–♀Fst) and X–Y differentiation (X–Y dif.) at sex-linked loci.

Fis was also adjusted by Fis at autosomal loci (auto. Fis) and Fis at sex-linked loci in female (♀Fis).

H. arborea R. temporaria
N R2 P N R2 P
Fis  vs. ♂–♀Fst 14 0.86 <0.001 10 0.82 <0.001
Fis (adjusted by auto. Fis) vs. ♂–♀Fst 14 0.86 <0.001
Fis (adjusted by ♀Fis) vs. ♂–♀Fst 14 0.70 <0.001 10 0.90 <0.001
♂–♀Fstvs. X–Y dif. 14 0.71 <0.001
Fis  vs. X–Y dif. 28 0.75 <0.001
Fis (adjusted by auto. Fis) vs. X–Y dif. 27 0.70 <0.001
Fis (adjusted by ♀Fis) vs. X–Y dif. 14 0.43 0.010

Notes.

Abbreviations

N
number of populations
R2
fit of linear regression
P
p-value of linear regressions