Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;5:e3268. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3268

Table 1. Studies collecting data from PHR users or non-participants.

Author(s), year Investigation type Population Participants
Anderson (2004) Telephone interview survey 3,000 186
Atreja et al. (2005) Focus groups/interviews with clinic staff; observation 15
Butler et al. (2013) Telephone interviews with patients 404 39
Cho et al. (2010) Postal survey questionnaire 201
Chrischilles et al. (2014) Mixed methods: user-centred design with evaluation; questionnaire 15,000 1,075
Crabb, Rafie & Weingardt (2011) Interview survey 75 50
Emani et al. (2012) Postal survey questionnaire 1,500 760
Fuji, Abbott & Galt (2014) Interviews with trained users 59 23
Goel et al. (2011a) Telephone interviews with non adopters 159
Greenhalgh et al. (2008) Mixed methods: Interviews/focus groups 103/67
Hall et al. (2014) Trial of result communication via PHR 66 49
Hilton et al. (2012) Online survey (within supported PHR use) 2,871 338
Kim et al. (2009) Mixed methods: paper questionnaire, analysis of user logs 330 70
Kruse et al. (2012) Interviews about internet use 713 638
Lober et al. (2006) Analysis of data about PHR use 170 41
McCleary-Jones et al. (2013) Interviews 350 88
Mishuris et al. (2014) Semistructured interviews with patients 3
Roblin et al. (2009) Paper survey with online option (non-adopters) 5,309 1,777
Taha et al. (2013) Lab usability test of a simulated PHR 107
Weitzman, Kaci & Mandl (2009) Focus groups, usability testing, email 302