Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2017 Jan 24;187(2):186–195. doi: 10.1667/RR14453.1

TABLE 4.

Radiation Dose Response for Two Latency Windows (<20 and ≥20 years) Based on Patients from Hodgkin Lymphoma, Testicular Cancer and Cervical Cancer Studies

Stomach tumor dose (Gy) Lateincy <20 years
Latency ≥20 years
All latencies
Cases/controlsb Mean dose OR (95% CI) Cases/controlsb Mean dose OR (95% CI) Cases/controls OR (95% CI)
0–0.19a 27/83     0.016 1.0 11/34     0.003 1.0 37/115 1.0
>0.2–4.99 114/211   1.62 1.6 (0.96, 2.7)   64/153   1.74 1.4 (0.66, 3.2) 176/362 1.5 (0.95, 2.4)
5–24.99 14/48 14.75 1.0 (0.4, 2.5) 17/19 14.01 13.0 (3.8, 54) 32/67 2.5 (1.2, 5.1)
25–34.99 17/41 30.28 2.1 (0.82, 5.7) 11/15 29.91 16.8 (4.1, 81) 28/56 3.8 (1.7, 8.8)
>35 35/47 40.55 5.0 (2.2, 11.5) 19/31 42.49 17.9 (4.9, 77) 54/78 6.5 (3.1, 14.0)
P trendc, d <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

a

Cases and controls without any radiation dose in the specified windows were allocated according to the two latency groups by the length of the interval between first and second cancer diagnoses.

b

Numbers of cases and controls with nonzero radiation doses in the specified window. Patients could have radiation dose included in both the <20 and >20 year windows.

c

To evaluate trends with time since exposure, we used the year of the first annual radiation dose that exceeded 5 Gy or the date of the first dose, for patients who never received an annual dose of 5 Gy or more. See Supplementary Materials (http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR14453.1.S1) for additional details on the trend tests.

d

A four-degrees-of-freedom test for homogeneity of the categorical OR by latency yields P = 0.0024.