Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176402

Table 5. Ranking with stability values for each treatment (genetic group, sex, and environment) in chicken obtained from SLqPCR package.

Values into the parenthesis refer to ranking by SLqPCR to each treatment. Values on the last column refer to the ranking position by RankAggreg package among all the treatments.

SLqPCR Package
GENES General (n = 36) Peloco (n = 12) Cobb (n = 12) Caneluda (n = 12) Comfort (n = 18) Stress (n = 18) Male (n = 18) Female (n = 18) Rank
ACTA1 1.05 (7) 0.50 (4) 1.54 (10) 0.59 (7) 0.39 (1) 1.13 (7) 1.4 (8) 0.58 (4) 6
UBC 1.14 (8) 0.65 (8) 1.13 (7) 0.76 (9) 0.55 (4) 1.24 (8) 1.51 (9) 0.66 (7) 9
HPRT1 0.81 (5) 0.54 (6) 1.22 (8) 0.36 (1) 0.44 (3) 0.63 (4) 0.96 (5) 0.63 (6) 5
LDHA 0.98 (6) 0.52 (5) 1.39 (9) 0.68 (8) 0.39 (1) 1.01 (6) 1.30 (7) 0.7 (8) 7
MRPS27 0.34 (1) 0.25 (1) 0.35 (1) 0.47 (4) 0.92 (9) 0.40 (1) 0.26 (1) 0.40 (1) 1
EEF1 0.66 (4) 0.58 (7) 0.73 (4) 0.42 (3) 0.78 (6) 0.81 (5) 0.73 (4) 0.60 (5) 4
HMBS 1.21 (9) 0.93 (9) 0.91 (5) 0.36 (1) 0.61 (5) 1.38 (9) 1.14 (6) 0.81 (9) 8
MRPS30 0.34 (1) 0.25 (1) 0.35 (1) 0.53 (6) 0.9 (8) 0.40 (1) 0.26 (1) 0.40 (1) 2
RPL5 0.49 (3) 0.42 (3) 0.51 (3) 0.49 (5) 0.84 (7) 0.51 (3) 0.49 (3) 0.49 (3) 3
TFRC 1.35 (10) 1.21 (10) 1.03 (6) 0.92 (10) 1.08 (10) 1.51 (10) 1.63 (10) 1.00 (10) 10

This analysis method does not differentiate between positions 1 and 2 (the two most stable genes have the same stability value).