Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176185

Table 3. Analysis of DEGs for MAQC2 and MAQC3 given a nominal FDR ≤ 0.05.

Datasets Methods # of TP genes # of FP genes Actual FDR PPV SR SPR
MAQC2 DESeq 363 59 .140 .860 .931 .609
TMM 377 97 .204 .797 .967 .358
FQ 377 100 .210 .790 .967 .338
TC, Med & UQ 376 101 .212 .788 .964 .331
Med-pgQ2 362 22 .057 .942 .928 .854
UQ-pgQ2 364 21 .055 .945 .933 .861
MAQC3 DESeq 385 105 .214 .786 .990 .271
TMM 385 98 .203 .797 .990 .319
TC, Med & UQ 384 99 .204 .795 .987 .313
Med-pgQ2 & UQ-pgQ2 387 83 .177 .823 .995 .424

The number of true positive (TP) and the false positive (FP) genes, the actual false discovery rate (FDR), the positive predictive value (PPV), the sensitivity rate (SR) and specificity rate (SPR).