Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 24;11:781–790. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S133070

Table 1.

Variation of cone photoreceptor density analyzed by three different methods for healthy subjects

Methods 0.5 mm 1.0 mm 1.5 mm
RSM 28,436±2,426*** 21,233±1,796 13,620±1,348
SFM 29,727±2,474 20,777±1,767 13,764±1,233*
MIM 29,894±2,043 21,020±1,583 13,481±1,156

Notes: Average cone density of 150 trials (10 sequential trials of 15 healthy subjects, cells/mm2) ± SD.

*

P<0.05 (SFM > MIM, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and

***

P<0.001 (RSM < MIM, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

Abbreviations: RSM, region-based segmentation method; SFM, spatial filtering method; MIM, manual identification method; SD, standard deviation.