. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2016 Oct 31;88(4):1382–1397. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12653

Table 3.

Descriptive and Inferential Statistics for Mishap Behaviors After E’s Return, by Avoidance Group

(n=32)	Low avoidance(n=15)	High avoidance(n=17)	Group Difference(F)	Cue Difference(F)	Cue x Group(F)
Gaze Aversion
Frequency	2.07 (1.03)	4.41 (1.77)	20.21^***	3.98^*	.20
Latency (seconds)	21.50 (20.37)	9.72 (6.85)	5.06^*	-	-
Bodily Avoidance
Frequency	.20 (.56)	1.24 (1.44)	6.84^*	1.23	1.85
Latency (seconds)	55.94 (12.10)	40.27 (25.69)	4.65^*	-	-
Telling
Frequency	1.93 (1.94)	1.12 (1.73)	1.83	5.63^***	.80
Latency (seconds)	20.75 (18.15)	37.64 (28.78)	3.82^†	-	-
Repairing
Frequency	2.07 (2.09)	.24 (.44)	12.53^**	2.50^*	1.63
Latency (seconds)	30.61 (17.82)	51.24 (14.73)	12.86^**	-	-
			χ²
% Telling	80%	41%	4.98^*	-	-
% Repairing	80%	24%	10.17^**	-	-
% Telling AND Repairing	60%	12%	8.22^**	-	-

^†

p < .1;

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001

Note: frequencies of gaze aversion and bodily avoidance were used in creating the groups, and accordingly are necessarily different between the groups.