Table 2. Comparison of Different Results From the Literature of the Last 15 Years [2, 6, 9, 10, 13-17].
| Authors | Equivalent dose EQD2 | Percentage of 2-year survival |
|---|---|---|
| Kramer et al* [13] | 24 | 3 |
| Present study | 26 | 0 |
| Sundstrom et al* [6] | 26 | 8 |
| Schroder et al [14] | 31 | 2 |
| Kramer et al* [13] | 33 | 7 |
| Present study | 33 | 7 |
| Nawrocki et al* [15] | 33 | 6 |
| Erridge et al* [2] | 33 | 8 |
| Jeremic et al* [16] | 42 | 9 |
| Present study | 45 | 11 |
| Sundstrom et al* [6] | 45 | 13 |
| Sundstrom et al* [6] | 50 | 10 |
| Schroder et al [14] | 52 | 5 |
| Janssen et al [9] | 31 - 46 | 15 |
| Janssen et al [9] | 47 - 52 | 20 |
| Van Oorschot et al [10] | 42 - 49 | 10 |
| Jeremic et al* [16] | 17 or 24 (+platinum-based chemo) | 12 (no stage IV in this study) |
| Nawrocki et al* [15] | 33 (+cisplatin/vinorelbine) | 24 (no stage IV in this study) |
| Strom et al* [17] | 45 (+carboplatin/vinorelbine) | 28 (no stage IV in this study) |
*Randomized study.