Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;7:234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00299-1

Table 3.

Summary of the overall and subgroup analysis results from different comparative genetic models.

Genetic model Overall Asian Caucasian High quality
OR1 (95%CI2) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
CC + CG vs. GG 1.65 (1.37–1.99) <0.001 2.11 (1.59–2.79) <0.001 1.36 (1.06–1.75) 0.015 1.60 (1.31–1.95) <0.001
CC vs. CG + GG 1.46 (0.73–2.93) 0.286 0.97 (0.13–7.23) 0.975 1.70 (0.77–3.77) 0.188 1.91 (1.09–3.36) 0.024
CC vs. GG 1.73 (0.90–3.32) 0.098 1.32 (0.21–8.21) 0.763 1.83 (0.87–3.85) 0.110 2.18 (1.48–3.22) <0.001
CG vs. GG 1.54 (1.26–1.88) <0.001 2.01 (1.46–2.77) <0.001 1.28 (0.99–1.67) 0.061 1.43 (1.14–1.78) 0.002
C vs. G 1.49 (1.28–1.74) <0.001 1.70 (1.18–2.46) 0.004 1.34 (1.10–1.64) 0.004 1.53 (1.16–2.01) 0.002

1odds ratio and 2confidence interval.