Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 28;21(5):795–803. doi: 10.1002/ejp.981

Table 2.

Numbers of rats responding to SCS treatment with a log (50% WT) increase ≥0.2 (%)

15′ 30′ 60′ 90′
5 Hz Day 1 5/8 (63) 7/8 (88) 2/8 (25) 3/8 (38)
Day 2 4/8 (50) 5/8 (63) 4/8 (50) 3/8 (38)
Day 3 4/8 (50) 6/8 (75) 4/8 (50) 2/8 (25)
Day 4 3/8 (38) 4/8 (50) 4/8 (50) 1/8 (13)
50 Hz Day 1 4/7 (57) 6/7 (86) 3/7 (43) 1/7 (14)
Day 2 4/6 (67) 4/6 (67) 1/6 (17) 1/6 (17)
Day 3 3/7 (43) 4/7 (57) 4/7 (57) 2/7 (29)
Day 4 5/7 (71) 5/7 (71) 3/7 (43) 3/7 (43)
500 Hz Day 1 4/10 (40) 5/10 (50) 6/10 (60) 7/10 (70)
Day 2 3/10 (30) 3/10 (30) 6/10 (60) 7/10 (70)
Day 3 3/10 (30) 5/10 (50) 8/10 (80) 7/10 (70)
Day 4 2/10 (20) 4/10 (40) 7/10 (70) 8/10 (80)
Sham Day 1 0/5 (0) 1/5 (20) 1/5 (20) 0/5 (0)
Day 2 0/5 (0) 1/5 (20) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0)
Day 3 1/5 (20) 1/5 (20) 1/5 (20) 0/5 (0)
Day 4 0/5 (0) 1/5 (20) 0/5 (0) 0/5 (0)