Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;30(5):e3687. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3687

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A, The comparison of uncorrected (isolated from Figure 3A), the linear model B 1‐corrected (isolated from Figure 3A with the subsequent linear B 1 correction), and the BE B 1‐corrected (isolated from Figure 3B) MTRRex,amide effect size as a function of B 1. B, The same as A but for MTRRex,NOE effect size. For the linear B 1 correction, a B 1 of 0.43 μT was assumed to be nominal B 1 (100%). All other B 1 levels were translated to percentages accordingly. The straight colored lines represent the linear regression relation between the corresponding metrics and B 1. The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) is shown in each subfigure.