Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychol. 2016 Feb 11;117:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.02.003

Table 3.

Hierarchical linear growth model fixed effects estimates predicting cortisol from situational perceived stress and individual differences in coping.

Model 1
Model 2
Engagement coping
Coping efficacy
Est. SE Est. SE
Intercept: waking cortisol, γ000 −1.41*** 0.04 −1.41*** 0.04
White race/ethnicity, γ001   0.20** 0.08   0.21** 0.08
Oral contraceptive use, γ002 −0.14* 0.08 −0.14* 0.08
Parental education, γ003 −0.12** 0.05 −0.10** 0.05
Engagement coping, γ004   0.05 0.04
Coping efficacy, γ004 −0.07 0.04
Cortisol awakening response, γ100   0.55*** 0.06   0.55*** 0.06
Oral contraceptive use, γ101 −0.35*** 0.11 −0.36*** 0.11
  0.20*** 0.05   0.21*** 0.05
Time since waking: diurnal slope, γ200 −0.11*** 0.01 −0.11*** 0.01
White race/ethnicity, γ201 − 0.03*** 0.01 −0.03*** 0.01
Parent education, γ202 −0.01** 0.01 −0.01* 0.01
Situation perceived stress level, γ300   0.03 0.02   0.03 0.02
Stress × engagement coping, γ301 −0.06** 0.03
Stress × coping efficacy, γ301 −0.07*** 0.02

Note.

842 situations nested within 63 individuals. Cortisol levels natural logarithmically transformed. Cortisol awakening response (1 = sample 30 min after waking, 0 = not sample 30 min after waking). Time since waking: how long after waking sample was provided. Coefficients are standardized. Est. = regression coefficient estimate. SE = robust standard error.

*

p < 0.10.

**

p < 0.05.

***

p < 0.01.